Melody Fowler, Candidate District 8, Current AISD Place 2

Home  ============ Teachers' Salaries ============ potential AISD employee child care benefit ============ Taxpayers' Funds at Risk ============ Open Letter to AISD Taxpayers ============ Citizens Defending Freedom vs. AISD Lawsuit ============== March 9, 2026 Newsletter ============= Arlington City CouncilGrades ============= AISD Board Grades ================ March 2, 2026 Newsletter ============ February 23, 2026 Newsletter ============ February 16, 2026 Newsletter =========== February 9, 2026 Newsletter ============ ================  Hunter Crow, Candidate for Mayor ============= Jim Ross, Mayor ============= Shaun Mallory, Candidate for Mayor ============ Steve Cavender, Candidate for Mayor ================ Kelly Burke, Candidate for Place 3 ============ Nikkie Hunter, District3 ================ Tom Ware, Candidate District 4 ============= Rojo Meixueiro, Candidate District 4 ============= Lisa Ventura, Candidate District 4 ================ Rebecca Boxall, District5 ============ Brittney Garcia-Dumas, Candidate District 5 ================ Jason Shelton, Candidate District 8 ============= Melody Fowler, Candidate District 8 current AISD-Place2 ============= Corey Harris, Candidate District 8 ================ Jan Tyler, Candidate for AISD Place 6 ============= Brooklyn Richardson, AISDPlace6 ================ Leanne Haynes, AISDPlace7 ============= Linton Davis, Candidate for AISD Place 7 ================ Mauricio Galante, District1 ============= Raul Gonzalez, District2 ============= Andrew Piel, District4 ============= Long Pham, District6 ============= Bowie Hogg, District7 ==============  Barbara Odom-Wesley, District8 ============= Sarah McMurrough, AISDPlace1 ============= Larry Mike, AISDPlace3 ============= David Wilbanks, AISDPlace4 ========== Justin Chapa, AISDPlace5 ============= Fact Sheet - November 8, 2022 Election ============ ++++++++++++  ============= Kennedale Observer Homepage =========== Investigation Report =============== Kennedale Senior Tax Freeze ============== 1083 Bowman Springs Road Kennedale ============ Kennedale City CouncilGrades ========== Texas Open Meetings Act Violations??? ============== The Bridge ============== Kennedale Observer - Latest Newsletter ============ Prior to That Newsletter ================== Brian Johnson, Candidate for Kennedale Mayor ============= Thelma Kobeck, Candidate for Kennedale Mayor ================ James Connor, Candidate for Kennedale Place 2 ============ Bryant Griffith, Candidate for Kennedale Place 2 ================ Ryon Ray, Candidate for Kennedale Place 4 ============= Melissa Barrow, Candidate for Kennedale Place 4 ================== Brad Horton, Kennedale Mayor ============ David Glover, Kennedale Place 1 ============= Ken Michels, Kennedale Place 3 ============= Jeff Nevarez, Kennedale Place 5 ============ Kennedale City Council Compare ========== Kennedale EDC MMA contract information ==============



 

1. Protection of Taxpayers' Dollars – please respond by February 26, 2026

How much of a priority should be placed on protecting taxpayers' dollars? If we are granting dollars for “economic development” should the company be vetted? Should an “economic development” grant require an actual application? Why or why not?

 Did not respond.

 

2. Density – please respond by March 5, 2026

a. How do you feel about SB840 which allows changing commercially zoned properties to mixed-use or multi-family zoned properties without an approval from P&Z and/or the city council? Why?

b. How do you feel about RMU (Regional Mixed Use) zoning and its potential 100 units/acre? Why?

 Did not respond.

 

3. Citizen Participation – please respond by March 12, 2026

In 2023 the city council voted to require preregistration and reduce speaking time for citizen participation (at the end of the meeting). Do you agree with this move? Is two minutes enough time to describe a situation and make desired comments/solutions/etc.?

 

 

4. Corporate Welfare – please respond by March 19, 2026

The City Council has given away millions of dollars and/or potential revenues to companies to encourage development. At what point has there been enough “encouragement” and when should the taxpayers-- and lowering tax rates-- become a higher priority than development? Why?

 

 

5. Communications – please respond by March 26, 2026

If you receive an e-mail from a constituent on an Arlington issue and the constituent logically laid out and well documented the issue, will you respond to the constituent? Why or why not? What actions will you take?

 

 

6. Issues – please respond by April 2, 2026

Other than public safety what is the most important issue the city council is currently facing? Why? What are your suggestions for addressing this issue?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Taxpayers' Dollars – please respond by February 29, 2024

Currently the AISD has the highest M&O rate of any ISD in Tarrant County. Staff has started budgeting for the paying of recapture (“Robin Hood”). How fiscally responsible should the board be with taxpayers' dollars and why? How high of a priority should fiscal responsibility be and why? What are your suggestions to be more fiscally responsible?

Did not respond.

 

 

2. Transgender – please respond by March 7, 2024

Which locker rooms/restrooms, etc., should transgender students be using? Should there be a District policy? Why or why not?

Did not respond.

 

3. Teachers' Salaries – please respond by March 14, 2024

Is having the highest teachers' salaries in the north Texas area a good thing? Why or why not?

 
Did not respond.

 

4. Student Achievement Goals – please respond by March 21, 2024

The district has performance improvement plans where the goals are for less than 50% of the students meeting or exceeding grade level expectations on the state achievement assessments. Is this acceptable? Why or why not? What are your suggestions regarding student achievement goal plans?

 Did not respond.

 

5. Communications – please respond by March 28, 2024

If you receive an e-mail from a constituent on an AISD issue and the constituent logically laid out and well documented the issue, will you respond to the constituent? Why or why not? What actions will you take?

Did not respond.

 

6. Issues – please respond by April 4, 2024

What is the most important issue the board is currently facing? Why? What are your suggestions for addressing this issue?

Did not respond.

 
 
 
 
To: fowler.aisd@gmail.com <fowler.aisd@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 09:19:17 AM CDT
Subject: Five questions
 
 
Ms. Fowler,
 
Since  there is a very confining two-minute time limit for speakers I am forced to send you an e-mail with my questions.
 
Here is my two major problems with the 4% raise.
1. As Dr. Reich stated at the May 18 meeting, we are already at the top of the chart [setting the standard concerning salaries]. By giving another 4% [for the fourth? year in a row]  you are NOT just staying competitive [as Ms. McMurrough stated], but actually causing ISD inflation. Think about it, you are already on top and setting the price even higher. If the only way you can get people to come and/or stay is to overpay over everyone else's price, there must be something else that is wrong, and I say fix that. I also have to question the "heart" of people that are only going where the top dollar is. For paying the top dollar, are we on top of all the ratings? NO, we are not. There are other districts that are paying less and rated higher [obtaining more from their employees]. [I am NOT trying to imply AISD is doing bad, certainly a whole lot better than say FWISD, but others are doing better with less dollars.]
 
2. ESSER funds are limited and not forever lasting. So you may think $8.6 million deficit for FY23-24 already accounting for ESSER and vacancy funds might be good, but when no more ESSER funds are available, you are talking an already vacancy adjusted $33 million deficit for future years. The raises accumulate. The ESSER funds expire. We are being set up for a disaster.
 
1. Do you see how a 4% raise is causing ISD inflation?
 
2. Do you believe there might be better solutions other than just giving a 4% raise?
 
Another thing discussed at the May 18 meeting, with no fanfare, was the debt service fund having a $10.6 million surplus. The debt service fund should basically have a cushion (for protection of soft tax collections) then basically aim for annual zero balances for debt service expenditures [The district should already have a good idea what the value of those expenses will be tor the year]. In my mind that is another 3-cent reduction that should be coming off the total tax rate.
 
3. Do you think the district should be investigating lowering the taxpayers' tax rate by looking at lowering the debt service piece?
 
The Dallas Cowboys and Texas Rangers make payments to the AISD for taking properties off the tax rolls for stadiums. I believe both pay a six-digit figure. In theory, how school funding works, the M&O total dollars are not affected by whether these properties are on the tax rolls or not, but the debt service piece certainly is. In fairness to the taxpayer these funds should be going to the debt service fund, not the general fund.
 
4. Do you believe that in fairness to the taxpayers, these stadium payoffs for taking properties off the tax rolls should be added to the debt service fund, helping to lower the total tax bill to taxpayers?
 
5. Do you believe two minutes is the correct time limit for AISD speakers?
 
Sincerely,
 
Did not respond.
 
 
======================
 
To: fowler.aisd@gmail.com <fowler.aisd@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 at 10:18:15 AM CDT
Subject: Two questions
 
Ms. Fowler,
 
The FY2023-24 Budget discussed at last night's board meeting has the taxpayers spending greater than $6.1 million on recapture/"Robin Hood".
 
Question 1:  Is this efficient use of taxpayers' dollars?
 
Question 2: What options are available to reduce that amount to $0?
 
Sincerely,
 
 
From: Melody Fowler <fowler.aisd@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 at 10:19:22 AM CDT
Subject: Budget
 
Good morning,
 
     Thank you for reaching out to me. I would like to answer the two questions you asked.
 
1. The district is required by the Texas Education Code 49 to pay recapture.
2. The increase in taxable values and the decrease in student enrollment can lead to a district being identified as having excess local revenue as determined by the Texas Education Code. An increase in student enrollment and decrease in taxable values can reduce excess local revenue (recapture). The district does not determine taxable values. Taxable values are determined by the Appraisal District.
 
I hope this answers your questions. Again, thank you for reaching out.
 
Best,
Melody Fowler